Role of “Majority Rule” in the Collapse of Democracy

Constitutional_Convention_1787

In 2016, I wrote an article titled The Role of “Majority Rule” in the Collapse of Democracy. It was for a writer’s workshop called Medium.com. Most articles written for Medium just capture the attention of a few dozen other authors. This one was different. To date, it has drawn over 5,500 views. I think its message is very appropriate for the purpose of my new book Collapse 2020 Vol. 1: Fall of the First Global Civilization. Take a look at the link above.

In short, the book and the article make the following points:

• “Majority rule” is one of the great flaws of modern democracy. It can only work for societies where a strong and broad consensus of beliefs already exists. The clash of so many cultures in modern society makes this impossible.

• “Majority rule” doesn’t work where there are a lot of candidates representing different causes.

• “Majority rule” allows huge injustices to be perpetrated on “minorities”. An extreme example is the case of a “lynch mob”. Majority rule justifies these atrocities.

• “Majority rule” is directly at odds with the principle of a “Bill of Rights”.

• “Majority rule” rests on a simple-minded belief in sayings like, “The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number”. While this sounds fine in the world of “Single Sentence Logic”, when the issue of complexity is included, it quickly falls apart.

 

The article closes with the following summary. For a complex MODERN society:

1. A majority-vote democracy should not be the goal. The goal should be FREEDOM and individual LIBERTY.

2. A majority-vote democracy, even with a theoretically perfect implementation, is a failed functional model for a complex modern society.

3. The goal of freedom, however, can’t be sought through anarchy. That would only lead back to struggles for power, dictatorship and the equivalent of slavery.

4. When many candidates are involved, the process must still be designed to involve all citizens uniformly in every step of the vote.

5. The issue of individual rights must be protected above majority rule.

These principles are also discussed on the A3 Society website under the headings: Philosophy / Truth; Government; and Personalized Democracy.

V1 Cover with info Twitter

About Bruce Nappi

Founder/Director of the A3 Research Institute, the A3 Society, the Humanist Friendship Group of New England. Co-founder of the School of the Medical Arts, the first all medical high school in the U.S. Eagle Scout on the 1965 North Pole Expedition. Worked for 40 years at the bleeding edge of high tech covering areas like nuclear power, robotics, medical instruments, automation, and healthcare. Most recently focused on medical simulation training at the University of Florida, College of Medicine. In 2010, published two books to summarize major discoveries in science, sociology, psychology, and world sustainability. In 2013, founded the A3 Research Institute to gather people of like interests, to implement the discoveries which support sustainability. In 2015, completed and published a major scientific paper which proposes a new structure for matter in the universe, presents a model for the Grand Unification of matter and energy, and supersedes Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. BS and MSc degrees from MIT ’69. My current primary focus is on Personalized Democracy, a major breakthrough to overcome gridlock in governments and the breakdown of communication between people in society. Personalized Democracy will usher in a political system that, for the first time in history, gives citizens not only DIRECT access to all parts of government, but also control of legislation so that their personal needs are respected and implemented. Mr. Nappi holds BS and MSc degrees from MIT ‘69
This entry was posted in Absolutes, Constitution, Democracy, Elections, Freewill, Government, Language, Law, Morality, Progressive Politics, Social Justice, Society and Culture, Truth. Bookmark the permalink.